Part 3/Chapter 13/9-min read

Vascular Infection, Graft/Endograft Infection, Infected Aneurysm, and Aortoenteric Fistula

Vascular and prosthetic graft infection, infected aneurysm, and aortoenteric fistula approached as overlapping clinical syndromes rather than as a single naming problem. The chapter frames suspicion, classification, source control, conduit choice, and antimicrobial duration so each syndrome gets its appropriate operation.

Revision history

Listen to this chapter16 min · AI audio edition · two hostsAI narration

Choose a chapter overview or a specialist discussion. Each recording follows this published edition.

General medical education, not patient-specific advice.

Choose an audio edition

Definition and presentation

Vascular graft infection, mycotic (infected) native , and endovascular infection constitute a single multidisciplinary management domain encompassing prosthetic material, the native arterial wall, adjacent bowel, and overlying soft tissue . Standardized terminology dictates consistent classification across surgical, infectious disease, and imaging disciplines .

The ESVS 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines on Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections update the 2020 guideline. They should be distinguished from the separate Delphi documents on terminology and treatment, and from observational outcome series .

Endograft infection is uncommon but carries substantial early mortality and is frequently delayed. Following endovascular aneurysm repair (), the incidence of endograft infection is approximately 0.6%, with a mean interval to diagnosis of 22 to 25 months; more than one quarter of presentations involve an aortic fistula . Surveillance encounters late after EVAR or thoracic endovascular aortic repair () require evaluation of new constitutional symptoms, unexplained inflammation, perigraft gas or fluid, or bleeding to differentiate infection from routine aneurysm evolution.

Diagnosis uses the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) criteria, integrating clinical, surgical, microbiologic, and imaging inputs. The MAGIC framework serves as a sensitive screen; treating all suspected cases as infected yields sensitivity between 88.2% and 99%, but specificity relies on careful correlation to avoid premature explantation in low-probability scenarios .

DiagnosticMAGIC diagnostic classification criteria
Adult with prior reconstruction
Diagnostic trigger
A single major criterion or two minor criteria from different categories
Diagnostic classification
Suspected infection
Citation
Adult with prior reconstruction
Diagnostic trigger
One major criterion plus another major or minor criterion from a different category
Diagnostic classification
Diagnosed infection
Citation

Microbiology and diagnostic imaging

Appropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy independently predicts survival in hospitalized patients with vascular graft infection . Empiric therapy is anchored to the anatomic site and expected flora. For abdominal disease without aortoenteric fistula, the intended empiric spectrum covers gram-positive cocci, gram-negative bacilli, and anaerobes, with narrowing once operative cultures identify the target organism . The 2025 consensus reserves empirical antimicrobial treatment for complicated infection, such as sepsis or bleeding, or when diagnostic intervention is delayed. Choose the empirical regimen with infectious-disease and microbiology input, using anatomic site, fistula status, severity, previous cultures and local resistance risk. MRSA/MRSE coverage is conditional on risk, not automatic for every infection. Obtain appropriate cultures without delaying treatment of complicated infection, and narrow treatment when results are available; the 2025 consensus distinguishes thoracic from abdominal infection rather than prescribing one fixed combination for both.

Pathogen identity shapes both prognosis and diagnostic suspicion. Candida aortic graft infection establishes a distinct organism category with different counseling implications from non-Candida infection . Fastidious organisms such as Actinomyces require targeted deep cultures and adjustment of antimicrobial assumptions when the clinical course diverges from typical bacterial infection .

Imaging defines perigraft infection, fluid collections, bowel involvement, and the feasibility of reconstruction. Computed tomography angiography () maps the operative field but provides modest pooled diagnostic sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.63) for vascular graft infection; metabolic and nuclear imaging resolve ambiguity when CTA is equivocal . For patients under late endograft surveillance, structural correlation with focal or heterogeneous uptake is required before committing to reoperation, rather than relying on a single maximum standardized uptake value () threshold . Quantitative baseline characteristics and imaging metrics do not reliably predict in-hospital or longer-term survival .

DiagnosticDiagnostic imaging performance in vascular graft infection
  • CTA
    Indication and utility
    Anatomic mapping and baseline assessment
    Diagnostic performance and pitfalls
    Modest pooled sensitivity (0.67) and specificity (0.63)
    Citation
  • 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Indication and utility
    Equivocal findings or localizing infection prior to reoperation
    Diagnostic performance and pitfalls
    Sensitivity 0.92 to 0.95, specificity 0.76 to 0.80; false positives occur from persistent early postoperative inflammation
    Citation
  • White-cell SPECT/CT
    Indication and utility
    Equivocal CT findings
    Diagnostic performance and pitfalls
    High sensitivity (0.99) and specificity (0.82)
    Citation

Treatment and reconstruction thresholds

Antimicrobial therapy reduces microbial burden and treats bacteremia, but operative source control is required to remove infected prosthetic material, close fistulas, and debride necrotic tissue . Complete excision of infected material with in-situ reconstruction is the standard for patients who can tolerate the physiological burden. Emergency operative timing is an independent predictor of early mortality, prioritizing preoperative physiologic stabilization when feasible .

In-situ reconstruction incorporates aggressive debridement, targeted conduit selection, prolonged antibiotic therapy, and vascularized tissue coverage; omental coverage specifically improves infection clearance and healing . Conduit choices include autogenous femoral vein (neoaortoiliac system, ), cryopreserved allograft, antibiotic-bonded prosthetic, and silver-impregnated prosthetic. NAIS and cryopreserved allografts show no statistically significant difference in 30-day or 1-year mortality for fit patients, though overall morbidity remains high (81%) and recurrent sepsis frequently involves gram-negative and drug-resistant organisms . Peripheral prosthetic infections use the same source-control and follow-up principles .

Abdominal aortic graft infection surgical strategies
  • Fit patient with safely resectable infection

    Preferred management pathway
    Complete graft removal and in-situ reconstruction
    Outcomes and key caveats
    Lowest reinfection rate (8%) and superior 3- to 5-year survival compared to extra-anatomic bypass (reinfection 22.4%)
    Citation
  • Localized contamination, intact anastomoses, no bowel communication

    Preferred management pathway
    Graft preservation with debridement
    Outcomes and key caveats
    Requires prolonged antibiotic stewardship; 1-year mortality (16.1% vs 28.7% for removal) is confounded by strict patient selection
    Citation
  • Prohibitive operative risk or unfit for excision

    Preferred management pathway
    Individualized antimicrobial treatment, with drainage when appropriate and an explicit suppressive, bridging or palliative goal
    Outcomes and key caveats
    Assess fistula, bleeding and source-control feasibility. A single pooled mortality percentage is not transferable across abdominal EVAR infection, selected thoracic graft infection and drainage cohorts.
    Citation

The operative decision pathway follows a stepwise assessment of fitness, contamination, and source-control feasibility:

  1. Baseline operative risk and the feasibility of definitive source control dictate the management pathway.
  2. Complete graft excision and in-situ reconstruction (autogenous vein, cryopreserved allograft, or antimicrobial-bonded prosthetic) or extra-anatomic bypass is the standard of care for fit patients with resectable disease.
  3. Partial excision or graft preservation with aggressive debridement is reserved for highly selected patients with localized contamination, intact anastomoses, and no fistula, requiring long-term antibiotic commitment.
  4. When excision is not undertaken, record whether the goal is suppression, a bridge to reconstruction, or palliation. Drainage can provide microbiological sampling and adjunctive source control, but does not repair a fistula or unstable anastomosis. Recurrent sepsis or bleeding requires reassessment of the original plan .

Anatomic populations must remain separate when counseling about outcomes. A 2025 cohort of selected root, ascending-aortic and arch graft infections reported 82.9% estimated survival over median 4.8-year follow-up among 44 patients managed without graft removal. It excluded descending and endovascular graft infections and cannot establish equivalent outcomes for abdominal EVAR infection or replace definitive source control when required .

Aortoenteric fistula and infected native aneurysm

Aortoenteric fistula presents as a hemorrhage and sepsis emergency. Definitive management for secondary aortoenteric fistula is surgical, consisting of complete graft excision combined with either extra-anatomic bypass or in-situ reconstruction and concurrent broad-spectrum antibiotics . Endovascular repair provides high initial hemodynamic stabilization (approximately 86% in primary fistula) but is followed by a downstream rebleeding or reinfection rate near 42% to 44%, requiring conversion to open repair in up to one-third of patients . Preoperative sepsis and a secondary fistula etiology predict worse outcomes. Endovascular therapy is therefore used as a temporizing bridge in unstable patients, not as definitive source control .

Infected native aortic aneurysms demand a similar distinction between temporization and definitive therapy. Open surgical repair is associated with a lower rate of subsequent graft infection compared to endovascular exclusion (5.4% versus 13.3%), although selection bias heavily favors open repair in fitter patients . Endovascular exclusion serves as a hemorrhage-control or bridging strategy in high-risk patients; it carries a hospital mortality of 11.8%, 1- and 2-year cumulative survival of 86.3% and 80.5%, and a recurrent aortic infection rate of 23.3%, mandating lifelong antibiotics and structured surveillance .

Postoperative surveillance and antimicrobial suppression

The chosen operative or endovascular strategy determines the postoperative surveillance burden and expected failure modes. Long-term incidence of vascular graft infection is similar following open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and EVAR, and late mortality remains substantial when infected grafts are not explanted .

Post-treatment surveillance tracks constitutional symptoms, inflammatory markers, operative cultures, perigraft collections, and metabolic imaging trajectory. Anticipated failure modes dictate imaging intervals: endovascular bridges and graft-preservation strategies require monitoring for progressive infection and new fistulization, while in-situ reconstructions require monitoring for reinfection, pseudoaneurysm, and progressive conduit degeneration .

Antimicrobial suppression constitutes active longitudinal therapy. Treatment duration and operative-culture narrowing are guided by multispecialty consensus . Antimicrobial duration depends on source control, conduit and organism rather than a universal lifelong prescription. The 2025 Delphi consensus supports six weeks total treatment after complete removal with autologous vein replacement, with an early oral switch possible when an appropriate bioavailable agent is available. When prosthetic material remains, it generally supports at least 4–6 weeks intravenously followed by oral treatment to a total of 12 weeks. Persistent infection, virulent organisms or incomplete source control may require longer treatment or suppression, decided with infectious-disease expertise. Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy () for aortic vascular graft infection introduces substantial treatment intensity and line-related events after hospital discharge, requiring continuous reassessment of the reconstructive plan in response to recurrent sepsis or toxicity .

Areas of controversy

The prognostic utility of quantitative metabolic imaging metrics (such as SUVmax cutoffs on 18F-FDG ) is unestablished for reliably predicting in-hospital mortality, long-term survival, or definitive operative timing in vascular graft infection .

The comparative durability and equivalence among in-situ reconstruction conduits (autogenous vein, cryopreserved allograft, silver-impregnated prosthetics, and antibiotic-bonded prosthetics) remain heavily confounded by selection bias, with broadly similar pooled reinfection rates but differing availability and operative burdens .

The long-term safety of partial graft excision or graft preservation for localized contamination lacks randomized validation; reported survival advantages in small cohorts are recognized as reflections of stringent patient selection rather than equivalence of indication .

Further reading

  • Surgical management of abdominal aortic graft infection: network meta-analysis. (2024). Aortic graft infection surgical strategies; network evidence has selection and indirectness limits.
  • Secondary aortoenteric fistula: a narrative review of the view of the surgeon. (2024). Secondary aortoenteric fistula clinical background.

References

  1. 1.
    Vascular Graft Infections, Mycotic Aneurysms, and Endovascular Infections: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2016

    Vascular Graft Infections, Mycotic Aneurysms, and Endovascular Infections: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016. doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000457.

  2. 2.
    Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections: A Delphi Consensus Document on Terminology, Definitions, Treatment, Outcomes, Follow Up, and Reporting Standards. 2026.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2026

    Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections: A Delphi Consensus Document on Terminology, Definitions, Treatment, Outcomes, Follow Up, and Reporting Standards. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.07.044.

  3. 3.
    Endograft Infection After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2017.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2017

    Endograft Infection After Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2017. doi:10.1177/1526602817722018.

  4. 4.
    Treatment and outcomes of aortic endograft infection. Journal of vascular surgery. 2016.
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2016

    Treatment and outcomes of aortic endograft infection. Journal of vascular surgery. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.113.

  5. 5.
    European Society for Vascular Surgery 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. 2020.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2020

    European Society for Vascular Surgery 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.016.

  6. 6.
    Validation of the MAGIC Criteria for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft/Endograft Infection. 2021.
    PubMed-indexed article2021

    Validation of the MAGIC Criteria for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft/Endograft Infection. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.05.010.

  7. 7.
    Diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection using the management aortic graft infection collaboration (MAGIC) criteria. Vascular. 2026.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    Diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection using the management aortic graft infection collaboration (MAGIC) criteria. Vascular. 2026. doi:10.1177/17085381251326995.

  8. 8.
    Long-term Prognosis Following Vascular Graft Infection: A 10-Year Cohort Study. Open forum infectious diseases. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2022

    Long-term Prognosis Following Vascular Graft Infection: A 10-Year Cohort Study. Open forum infectious diseases. 2022. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac054.

  9. 9.
    Treatment and follow-up of vascular graft and endograft infection: Delphi consensus document. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2025

    Treatment and follow-up of vascular graft and endograft infection: Delphi consensus document. Clinical microbiology and infection: the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.07.020.

  10. 10.
    Outcomes of Candida and Non-Candida Aortic Graft Infection. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed article2023

    Outcomes of Candida and Non-Candida Aortic Graft Infection. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2023. doi:10.1177/15385744221129236.

  11. 11.
    Actinomyces spp. Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection (PVGI): A Multicenter Case-Series and Narrative Review of the Literature. Microorganisms. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed article2023

    Actinomyces spp. Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection (PVGI): A Multicenter Case-Series and Narrative Review of the Literature. Microorganisms. 2023. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11122931.

  12. 12.
    Diagnostic Imaging in Vascular Graft Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2018.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2018

    Diagnostic Imaging in Vascular Graft Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery: the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.07.010.

  13. 13.
    [(18)F] FDG PET/CT can improve the diagnostic accuracy for aortic endograft infection. Acta cardiologica. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed article2022

    [(18)F] FDG PET/CT can improve the diagnostic accuracy for aortic endograft infection. Acta cardiologica. 2022. doi:10.1080/00015385.2021.1949105.

  14. 14.
    The value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT in the management of infective native aortic aneurysms. Vascular. 2021.
    PubMed-indexed article2021

    The value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT in the management of infective native aortic aneurysms. Vascular. 2021. doi:10.1177/1708538120987971.

  15. 15.
    Aortic Vascular Graft and Endograft Infection - Patient Outcome Cannot Be Determined Based on Pre-Operative Characteristics DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010269
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2024
  16. 16.
    Prosthetic vascular graft infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of 18FDG PET/CT. General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2022

    Prosthetic vascular graft infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic accuracy of 18FDG PET/CT. General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2022. doi:10.1007/s11748-021-01682-6.

  17. 17.
    Management and Clinical Outcome of Aortic Graft Infections: A Single-Center Retrospective Study DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216588
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2022
  18. 18.
    Infections of the aorta DOI: 10.1007/s12055-021-01173-6
    PubMed-indexed articleReview2022
  19. 19.
    Neoaortoiliac system and cryopreserved human allograft for the treatment of aortic graft infections DOI: 10.1177/17085381221091372
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2023
  20. 20.
    Outcomes Following in Situ Reconstruction for Aortic Infection with the Neo-Aortoiliac System and Aortic Homograft. Annals of vascular surgery. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed article2023

    Outcomes Following in Situ Reconstruction for Aortic Infection with the Neo-Aortoiliac System and Aortic Homograft. Annals of vascular surgery. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2022.10.006.

  21. 21.
    Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2014.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2014

    Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. 2014. doi:10.1093/cid/ciu444.

  22. 22.
    Peripheral Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection: A 5-Year Retrospective Study DOI: 10.3390/medsci13020071
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2025
  23. 23.
    Surgical management of abdominal aortic graft infection: network meta-analysis. BJS open. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2024

    Surgical management of abdominal aortic graft infection: network meta-analysis. BJS open. 2024. doi:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad151.

  24. 24.
    Clinical outcome of graft removal versus preservation in abdominal aortic graft infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of surgical treatment and research. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2023

    Clinical outcome of graft removal versus preservation in abdominal aortic graft infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of surgical treatment and research. 2023. doi:10.4174/astr.2023.105.4.207.

  25. 25.
    Percutaneous Drainage for Aortic Graft Infection Post-aneurysm Repair: A Viable Option? Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed article2022

    Percutaneous Drainage for Aortic Graft Infection Post-aneurysm Repair: A Viable Option? Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2022. doi:10.1177/15385744221075136.

  26. 26.
    Outcomes of conservative treatment for thoracic vascular graft infections DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaf171
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2025
  27. 27.
    Secondary aortoenteric fistula: surgeon's narrative review DOI: 10.5114/amsad/186358
    PubMed-indexed articleReview2024
  28. 28.
    A Case Series of Secondary Aortoenteric Fistula after Open Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Timing and Technique of Surgery DOI: 10.3400/avd.cr.22-00031
    PubMed-indexed articleCase report2022
  29. 29.
    In situ reconstruction with autologous graft in the treatment of secondary aortoenteric fistulas: A retrospective case series DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.020
    PubMed-indexed article2019
  30. 30.
    Primary aortoenteric fistula: endovascular repair review DOI: 10.5114/kitp.2022.122092
    PubMed-indexed articleReview2022
  31. 31.
    Outcome after endovascular stent graft repair of aortoenteric fistula: A systematic review. Journal of vascular surgery. 2009.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2009

    Outcome after endovascular stent graft repair of aortoenteric fistula: A systematic review. Journal of vascular surgery. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.068.

  32. 32.
    Secondary aortoenteric fistula after endovascular aortic interventions: a systematic literature review. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR. 2008.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2008

    Secondary aortoenteric fistula after endovascular aortic interventions: a systematic literature review. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology: JVIR. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2007.10.013.

  33. 33.
    Analysis of antibiotic strategies to prevent vascular graft or endograft infection after surgical treatment for infective native aortic aneurysms: a systematic review. Antimicrobial resistance and infection control. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2024

    Analysis of antibiotic strategies to prevent vascular graft or endograft infection after surgical treatment for infective native aortic aneurysms: a systematic review. Antimicrobial resistance and infection control. 2024. doi:10.1186/s13756-024-01477-3.

  34. 34.
    Midterm outcomes of endovascular treatment for infected aortic aneurysms: Single center experience. Vascular. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Midterm outcomes of endovascular treatment for infected aortic aneurysms: Single center experience. Vascular. 2024. doi:10.1177/17085381221140170.

  35. 35.
    Vascular Graft Infection After Aneurysm Repair: A Population-Based Study. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2023

    Vascular Graft Infection After Aneurysm Repair: A Population-Based Study. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.02.027.

  36. 36.
    Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for aortic vascular graft infection; a five-year retrospective evaluation DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06373-4
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2021
  37. 37.
    Aortic Endograft Infection: Diagnosis and Management DOI: 10.5758/vsi.230071
    PubMed-indexed articleReview2023
  38. 38.
    A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes After In Situ Reconstructions for Aortic Graft Infection. Angiology. 2018.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2018

    A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes After In Situ Reconstructions for Aortic Graft Infection. Angiology. 2018. doi:10.1177/0003319717710114.

  39. 39.
    Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections 2026-07-14.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Vascular Graft and Endograft Infections 2026-07-14. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2026.05.035.

  40. 40.
    Diagnosis of Aortic Graft Infection: A Case Definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) 2016.
    PubMed-indexed article2016

    Diagnosis of Aortic Graft Infection: A Case Definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) 2016. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.09.007.

Educational use only

AI assists this editorial workflow. Published updates are human-reviewed before publication.

Not intended to diagnose, monitor, predict, prognose, treat, or alleviate disease.

Verify clinically relevant information against primary sources and current guidelines.

Updates and feedback

You are reading the published chapter.

What has changed

Loading the change history…

Report a problem