Part 3/Chapter 17/6-min read

Hybrid OR Workflow, Team Safety, Simulation, and Robotic/Minimally Invasive Interfaces

The hybrid operating room as a clinical system for cases that may change direction: complex aortic repair, branched and fenestrated work, hybrid arch procedures, and limb-salvage workflows. The chapter frames team safety, simulation, imaging integration, and robotic and minimally invasive interfaces.

Edited by Tal M. Hörer MD, PhD · David T. McGreevy MD, PhD·Reviewed ·5 sections · 40 references

Listen to this chapter9 min · AI audio edition · two hostsAI narration

Planning conference: A practical planning-room conversation: anatomy, device or operative choices, surveillance, complications, and decision boundaries.

General medical education, not patient-specific advice.

Choose the hosts

System definition and venue allocation

A hybrid operating room operates as a single clinical system integrating fixed high-quality fluoroscopy, cross-sectional imaging, full open-surgical capability, anesthesia, and perfusion support . The practical clinical return rests on case-mix breadth rather than single-procedure volume. Allocation is reserved for cases in which combined capability fundamentally alters management: immediate conversion to open repair, complex device orientation, multiple access sites, fusion imaging dependence, staged hybrid arch reconstructions, or emergency trauma and malperfusion syndromes .

Operational throughput depends strictly on governance rather than isolated equipment installation. High-throughput programs maintain dedicated multi-specialty dashboards, named clinical leads, and fixed elective slots to mitigate recognized constraints, which commonly include radiography downtime, complex turnover, contrast logistics, and cross-discipline staffing gaps . Standard elective endovascular cases are routed to conventional angiography suites to preserve hybrid access for high-complexity or combined procedures .

Hybrid operating room venue allocation

  • Standard endovascular

    Presentation
    Elective standard EVAR, isolated peripheral intervention
    Allocation strategy
    Conventional angiography suite to preserve hybrid availability
    Citation

  • Complex and hybrid

    Presentation
    FEVAR, BEVAR, hybrid arch, limb-salvage requiring conversion
    Allocation strategy
    Primary hybrid room allocation
    Citation

  • Emergency

    Presentation
    Type A dissection with malperfusion, threatened hemorrhage
    Allocation strategy
    Damage-control platform with rehearsed perfusion and open plans
    Citation

Team safety, workflow, and simulation

Surgical safety checklists provide a foundational reconciliation mechanism but depend on engaged multi-disciplinary execution rather than passive completion . In the 7,688-patient, eight-hospital validation, checklist adoption cut thirty-day mortality from 1.5% to 0.8% (P=0.003) and inpatient complications from 11.0% to 7.0% (P<0.001). In the hybrid environment, distractions cluster distinctly around contrast- and fluoroscopy-intensive phases, such as device deployment and completion angiography . A designated sterile-cockpit phase, announced by the primary operator, limits speech and movement strictly to case-critical information during target-vessel cannulation and stent-graft deployment.

A formal safety pause incorporates three natural operating-room checks:

  • Before anesthesia or incision: confirms patient identity, laterality, procedure, anticipated airway risk, and blood loss.
  • Before the high-consequence operative step: reconciles imaging availability, device inventory, anticoagulation, contrast limits, and emergency conversion plans.
  • Before leaving the room: confirms count reconciliation, correctable intraoperative findings, and structured handoff to intensive care .

Simulation curricula effectively accelerate procedural learning when built around proficiency-based progression (PBP) rather than defined exposure hours. The same proficiency-based approach lowers early procedural error rates on first patient application relative to time-based training . An effective program models both technical failure modes (access, cannulation, bailout) and non-technical coordination requirements across multi-disciplinary teams, using appropriately matched modalities spanning transparent physical models to advanced cadaveric preparations .

Radiation management and intraoperative imaging

Radiation safety requires an active ALARA protocol targeting patient dose, primary operator exposure, and scatter to surrounding personnel . Occupational limits frame that target: effective dose is capped at 20 mSv per year averaged over five consecutive years, with no single year above 50 mSv, and a declared pregnancy caps fetal dose at 1 mSv for the remainder of gestation. The equivalent-dose limit to the lens of the eye was lowered to 20 mSv per year, down from 150 mSv, after cataract was documented at lower thresholds . Procedural dose follows a consistent gradient: EVAR creates less exposure than TEVAR, and TEVAR creates significantly less than fenestrated and branched repair . Center-level variation heavily influences total exposure during complex repair, emphasizing the requirement to benchmark performance locally over time rather than relying solely on pooled device averages.

Exposure limitation combines low pulse-rate fluoroscopy, tight collimation, judicious magnification, and robust shielding arrays (table-mounted, ceiling-suspended, and floor components) . The increasing utilization of radial access for peripheral interventions typically elevates primary operator exposure due to proximity and oblique tube angulation, requiring specific pre-procedural shielding and projection mapping .

Image fusion derived from preoperative CTA supports initial navigation and decreases total contrast and fluoroscopy volumes, but relies on frequent registration checks . Aortic conformation and target-vessel ostia displace intraoperatively by 1.8 to 19.6 mm following stiff wire insertion and major device positioning, requiring reregistration and discrete angiographic confirmation of sealing zones . Fusion logic translates similarly into complex transcarotid, subclavian, and neurovascular techniques .

Intraoperative imaging and radiation thresholds

  • Baseline radiation management

    Modality or technique
    Fluoroscopy, collimation, magnification
    Action
    Default to low pulse rate, tight collimation, and last-image hold
    Citation

  • Image fusion guidance

    Modality or technique
    Preoperative CTA overlay
    Action
    Re-register following stiff-wire insertion; confirm alignment with independent angiography
    Citation

  • Equivocal sealing or kink

    Modality or technique
    Cone-beam CT
    Action
    Perform intraoperative acquisition to correct endoleak or compression
    Citation

Intraoperative imaging and radiation management relies on sequential protocols:

  1. Plan a case-specific radiation budget, pre-specifying expected fluoroscopy time and sequences to minimize exposure.
  2. Audit local dose against multicentre distributions, particularly for complex fenestrated or branched repair where center variance exceeds device-class effects. Flag any case that crosses a substantial radiation dose level, reference-point air kerma of 5 Gy, peak skin dose of 3 Gy, kerma-area product of 500 Gy·cm2, or 60 minutes of fluoroscopy, for dose documentation and clinical follow-up.
  3. Enforce a low-dose checklist including low pulse rate, collimation, and last-image-hold review.
  4. Re-register fusion roadmaps frequently, specifically following major wire or device changes, to correct expected target vessel displacements.
  5. Reserve high-dose cone-beam CT acquisitions for equivocal sealing, limb concern, or complex anatomy where correctable findings alter the immediate procedure.

Robotic and minimally invasive interfaces

Robotic catheter navigation for peripheral and selective visceral artery interventions introduces improved stability and decreased primary operator radiation dose by removing the operator from the immediate scatter field . Current applications establish technical feasibility for visceral cannulation when deployed following a staged progression from bench to phantom to early-human models.

Advanced teleoperated platforms with continuous force feedback and magnetically actuated endovascular thrombectomy components demonstrate bench and early clinical capability . Integration of these interfaces does not eliminate procedural risk; baseline requirements for standard access planning, independent imaging verification, and immediate manual bailout protocols remain intact.

Areas of controversy

The outcome justification for hybrid operating environments relies predominantly on retrospective cohorts, feasibility reports, and synthesised observational data, rather than patient-level randomized comparisons against standard angiography suites or conventional theatres . Consequently, the survival and complication benefit of the room itself is challenging to isolate from concurrent advances in endovascular device technology and multidisciplinary care protocols.

Evidence supporting robotic endovascular intervention confirms technical feasibility, operator ergonomics, and primary access success, but remains limited by an absence of long-term complication, primary patency, target-vessel re-intervention, or amputation-free survival comparisons against mature registry cohorts managing standard-of-care contemporary techniques .

References

  1. 1.
    Hybrid operating room applications in surgery: experiences and challenges. Updates Surg. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2022

    Hybrid operating room applications in surgery: experiences and challenges. Updates Surg. 2022. doi:10.1007/s13304-021-00989-6. PMID:33709242.

    PubMedDOI
  2. 2.
    Application of the Hybrid Operating Room in Surgery: A Systematic Review. Journal of investigative surgery: the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2022

    Application of the Hybrid Operating Room in Surgery: A Systematic Review. Journal of investigative surgery: the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research. 2022. doi:10.1080/08941939.2020.1838004.

    PubMedDOI
  3. 3.
    Experiences with and Practical Implications of Using a Hybrid Operating Room. Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed article2025

    Experiences with and Practical Implications of Using a Hybrid Operating Room. Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement. 2025. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89844-0_19.

    PubMedDOI
  4. 4.
    The difficulties and solutions in operationalising a hybrid operating room. The Journal of international medical research. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    The difficulties and solutions in operationalising a hybrid operating room. The Journal of international medical research. 2024. doi:10.1177/03000605241270700.

    PubMedDOI
  5. 5.
    Understanding the Costs of Surgery: A Bottom-Up Cost Analysis of Both a Hybrid Operating Room and Conventional Operating Room DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.119
    PubMed-indexed article2020
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  6. 6.
    Midterm Outcomes in Type A Aortic Dissection Repair With and Without Malperfusion in a Hybrid Operating Room PMID: 36567047
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2023
    PubMedOpen PDF
  7. 7.
    A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. 2009.
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2009

    A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. 2009. doi:10.1056/nejmsa0810119.

    PubMedDOI
  8. 8.
    Effective surgical safety checklist implementation. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011.
    PubMed-indexed article2011

    Effective surgical safety checklist implementation. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.01.052.

    PubMedDOI
  9. 9.
    Mapping Distractions in the Hybrid Operating Room During Elective Endovascular Aortic Procedures. World journal of surgery. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed article2025

    Mapping Distractions in the Hybrid Operating Room During Elective Endovascular Aortic Procedures. World journal of surgery. 2025. doi:10.1002/wjs.12605.

    PubMedDOI
  10. 10.
    [WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and guideline for safe surgery 2009]. Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology. 2014.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2009

    [WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and guideline for safe surgery 2009]. Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology. 2014. PMID:24724433.

    PubMed
  11. 11.
    A Systematic Review of Simulation-Based Training in Vascular Surgery. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2022

    A Systematic Review of Simulation-Based Training in Vascular Surgery. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.009.

    PubMedDOI
  12. 12.
    Surgical skill simulation training to proficiency reduces procedural errors among novice cardiac device implanters: a randomized study. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed articleRandomized controlled trial2024

    Surgical skill simulation training to proficiency reduces procedural errors among novice cardiac device implanters: a randomized study. Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology: journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2024. doi:10.1093/europace/euae229.

    PubMedDOI
  13. 13.
    Transparent aortic model training simulator for endovascular aortic interventions. BMC Med Educ. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed article2025

    Transparent aortic model training simulator for endovascular aortic interventions. BMC Med Educ. 2025. doi:10.1186/s12909-025-08422-x. PMID:41366412.

    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  14. 14.
    Optimizing cadaveric models for endovascular training through effective preparation techniques DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2025.101820
    PubMed-indexed article2025
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  15. 15.
    Simulation-based learning and human-factors training for percutaneous coronary intervention complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed article2025

    Simulation-based learning and human-factors training for percutaneous coronary intervention complications. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025. doi:10.1002/ccd.70418. PMID:41399196.

    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  16. 16.
    Unveiling team needs: a qualitative study of simulation training for endovascular cerebral thrombectomy DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002981
    PubMed-indexed article2024
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  17. 17.
    The Influence of Age and Experience on Safety Climate Perceptions Among Healthcare Staff in Operating, Interventional Radiology, and Hybrid Operating Rooms: A Cross-Sectional Study DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S538494
    PubMed-indexed article2026
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  18. 18.
    Radiation exposure in endovascular repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 2015.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2015

    Radiation exposure in endovascular repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.05.033.

    PubMedDOI
  19. 19.
    Occupational Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology: A Joint Guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology DOI: 10.1007/s00270-009-9756-7
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2010
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  20. 20.
    Patients' Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Annals of vascular surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Patients' Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Annals of vascular surgery. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.06.014.

    PubMedDOI
  21. 21.
    Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Exposure in TEVAR Versus EVAR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of vascular surgery. 2026.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2026

    Fluoroscopy Time and Radiation Exposure in TEVAR Versus EVAR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Annals of vascular surgery. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2026.01.003.

    PubMedDOI
  22. 22.
    Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of Patient Radiation Exposure During Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Ten-year Experience. Annals of surgery. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed articleRegistry / cohort2025

    Multicenter Prospective Evaluation of Patient Radiation Exposure During Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Ten-year Experience. Annals of surgery. 2025. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000006676.

    PubMedDOI
  23. 23.
    New tools to reduce radiation exposure during aortic endovascular procedures. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed article2022

    New tools to reduce radiation exposure during aortic endovascular procedures. Expert review of cardiovascular therapy. 2022. doi:10.1080/14779072.2022.2092096.

    PubMedDOI
  24. 24.
    Role of Laser Pointer in Budgeting Fluoroscopy-Time and Radiation Exposure PMID: 36125020
    PubMed-indexed article2022
    PubMedOpen PDF
  25. 25.
    Lucerne milestone approach for benchmarking and education: Towards ultra-low dose endovascular aortic repair DOI: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101705
    PubMed-indexed article2024
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  26. 26.
    Comprehensive Radiation Shield Minimizes Operator Radiation Exposure and Obviates Need for Lead Aprons. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed article2023

    Comprehensive Radiation Shield Minimizes Operator Radiation Exposure and Obviates Need for Lead Aprons. Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100603.

    PubMedDOI
  27. 27.
    Comparison of radiation exposure associated with transradial and transfemoral access: An updated meta-analysis. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2023

    Comparison of radiation exposure associated with transradial and transfemoral access: An updated meta-analysis. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2023. doi:10.1002/ccd.30513.

    PubMedDOI
  28. 28.
    Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape. Cureus. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed article2023

    Reduction in Primary Operator Radiation Dose Exposure During Coronary Angioplasty Using Radiation Absorbing Drape. Cureus. 2023. doi:10.7759/cureus.46619.

    PubMedDOI
  29. 29.
    3D image fusion in endovascular aortic repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2017.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2017

    3D image fusion in endovascular aortic repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2017. doi:10.1177/1526602817708196. PMID:28485198.

    PubMedDOI
  30. 30.
    Image Fusion During Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair, to Fuse or Not to Fuse? A Meta-analysis and Additional Data From a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort DOI: 10.1177/1526602820960444
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2020
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  31. 31.
    Target vessel displacement during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair and its implications for the role of traditional computed tomography angiography roadmaps DOI: 10.21037/qims-20-1077
    PubMed-indexed article2021
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  32. 32.
    Image fusion guidance for left subclavian artery in situ fenestration during thoracic endovascular repair DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02561-w
    PubMed-indexed article2024
    PubMedDOIOpen PDF
  33. 33.
    Intraoperative fusion imaging during transcarotid artery revascularization PMID: 37662569
    PubMed-indexed article2023
    PubMedOpen PDF
  34. 34.
    Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.). 2025.
    PubMed-indexed article2025

    Fusion Imaging in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke. Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.). 2025. doi:10.1161/svin.124.001636.

    PubMedDOI
  35. 35.
    Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography to improve outcomes after infrarenal endovascular aortic repair. Journal of vascular surgery. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed article2022

    Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography to improve outcomes after infrarenal endovascular aortic repair. Journal of vascular surgery. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.057.

    PubMedDOI
  36. 36.
    Robotic endovascular peripheral arterial interventions: a proposal of a new learning model. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Robotic endovascular peripheral arterial interventions: a proposal of a new learning model. Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil). 2024. doi:10.31744/einstein_journal/2024ao1058.

    PubMedDOI
  37. 37.
    Clinical Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Visceral Interventions. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2026.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    Clinical Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Visceral Interventions. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00270-025-04340-z.

    PubMedDOI
  38. 38.
    Evaluation of Fully Teleoperated Robotic Endovascular Interventions with Haptic Feedback: The SENTANTE Endovascular Robotic System. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2026.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    Evaluation of Fully Teleoperated Robotic Endovascular Interventions with Haptic Feedback: The SENTANTE Endovascular Robotic System. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. 2026. doi:10.1007/s00270-026-04375-w.

    PubMedDOI
  39. 39.
    Magnetic Milli-Spinner for Robotic Endovascular Surgery. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.). 2026.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    Magnetic Milli-Spinner for Robotic Endovascular Surgery. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.). 2026. doi:10.1002/adma.202508180.

    PubMedDOI
  40. 40.
    ICRP 2012
    PubMed-indexed article2012

    Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJ, et al. ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs, threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012 Feb;41(1-2):1-322.

    PubMedDOI

Educational use only

AI assists this editorial workflow. Published updates are human-reviewed before publication.

Not intended to diagnose, monitor, predict, prognose, treat, or alleviate disease.

Verify clinically relevant information against primary sources and current guidelines.

AI DisclosurePrivacyTermsCautions