Part 4/Chapter 22/8-min read

Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Juxtarenal/Paravisceral Disease, and Fenestrated/Branched Repair

Complex abdominal aortic aneurysm begins when the proximal or visceral aortic anatomy no longer permits a durable standard infrarenal seal. Management is an anatomic and physiologic decision: define the seal problem, map the renal and visceral targets, judge whether the patient can tolerate open suprarenal or thoracoabdominal reconstruction, and decide whether a fenestrated, branched, parallel-graft, physician-modified, or open strategy offers the safest durable repair.

Edited by Tal M. Hörer MD, PhD · David T. McGreevy MD, PhD·Version 1 · Last published ·7 sections · 30 references

Revision history

Listen to this chapter8 min · AI audio edition · two hostsAI narration

Choose a chapter overview or a specialist discussion. Each recording follows this published edition.

General medical education, not patient-specific advice.

Choose an audio edition

Definition and clinical presentation

Complex describes anatomy in which the proximal extent or renal/visceral involvement prevents straightforward standard infrarenal exclusion; device-specific seal requirements must also be considered. Complex repair is not synonymous with every non-standard adjunct. It includes open reconstruction and endovascular strategies that preserve involved branches: fenestrated, branched or combined configurations, physician-modified endografts (PMEGs), and selected parallel-graft techniques .

Anatomical classification defines the extent of target-vessel involvement:

  • Short-neck infrarenal: features a small sealing cuff below the renal arteries.
  • Juxtarenal: extends directly to the renal artery origins.
  • Pararenal: involves the renal segment directly.
  • Paravisceral or thoracoabdominal: incorporates the celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries into the repair zone.

Complex repairs possess distinct failure modes compared to standard infrarenal exclusion, including target-vessel loss, type I or III endoleak, spinal cord ischemia, and higher rates of late re-intervention.

Pre-operative imaging and stratification

Complex endovascular planning uses thin-section arterial , generally reconstructed at 1 mm or less, with multiplanar and centreline analysis. Map the entire relevant aorta and iliofemoral access, healthy proximal and distal seal zones, target-vessel origins and clock positions, branch dimensions, calcification and tortuosity. Include supra-aortic and upper-limb access vessels when the planned reconstruction or access requires them; arch branch involvement may also require assessment of intracranial collateral circulation. The ≤1-mm planning principle is supported by ESVS 2024; ESVS 2026 recommendations 6–7 specify thin-slice CTA and whole-aorta/access coverage for thoracic and thoracoabdominal disease, not indiscriminate neck scanning for every infrarenal AAA .

Magnetic resonance angiography may be useful when iodinated contrast or cumulative radiation is a concern, but its suitability for detailed device planning must be assessed for the individual case . Gated cardiac imaging is utilized when proximal thoracic pathology or severe coronary disease alters operative risk . Prior infrarenal endografts constrain sealing zones and alter device branch geometry, requiring specific mapping to identify the cause of failure .

Treatment selection and repair pathways

Complex management balances disease severity against the physiological stress of open surgery and the anatomical constraints of endovascular sealing. The decision framework sequences indication, open surgical tolerance, and endovascular feasibility.

  1. Decide observation versus intervention. Intervention is indicated for aneurysms reaching established diameter thresholds, rapid expansion, or symptomatic presentation, while stable smaller aneurysms are managed with surveillance . For asymptomatic complex AAA, repair may be considered at ≥5.5 cm in men or ≥5.0 cm in women, integrating fitness, anatomy and preference (ESVS 2024, IIb C). The diameter is not an automatic indication; higher procedural risk may favor continued surveillance. Confirm suspected rapid growth before changing the plan. Symptoms or rupture require urgent assessment outside the elective threshold framework.
  2. Decide endovascular versus open repair. Endovascular repair is preferred for high-risk patients with suitable target-vessel geometry, whereas open repair is preferred for young, fit patients with marginal endovascular anatomy and long life expectancy .
  3. Manage emergency presentation. Rupture or acute threat requires an urgent open or endovascular strategy selected for physiology, anatomy, immediately available devices and team expertise; it does not automatically mandate multibranched or parallel grafts .
Asymptomatic, below 5.5 cm in men or 5.0 cm in women
  • Preferred pathway
    Continued surveillance
    Key modifiers
    Growth rate, onset of symptoms
    Citation

  • At or above 5.5 cm in men or 5.0 cm in women, high open-surgical risk

    Preferred pathway
    Fenestrated or branched endovascular repair
    Key modifiers
    Access limits, target artery orientation
    Citation

  • At or above 5.5 cm in men or 5.0 cm in women, low surgical risk, marginal endovascular anatomy

    Preferred pathway
    Open surgical reconstruction
    Key modifiers
    Severe access constraints, marginal fenestration alignment
    Citation

  • Rupture or acute threat

    Preferred pathway
    Urgent intervention
    Key modifiers
    Device availability, hemodynamic stability
    Citation

Fenestrated and branched endovascular repair

Fenestrated repair places openings aligned with target-vessel ostia; fenestrations generally use bridging covered stents, whereas an open-edge scallop is not itself necessarily bridged. Directional branches provide another route to renal and visceral vessels, and a single endograft may combine fenestrations and branches to suit different vessel relationships. The choice depends on the seal zone, aortic lumen and branch geometry, not a rigid fenestrated-versus-branched dichotomy. Comparative complex-AAA evidence is predominantly observational, so lower early mortality in selected endovascular cohorts does not establish universal superiority over open repair .

Branched endovascular aneurysm repair is utilized for extensive visceral aortic involvement where flat fenestrations cannot provide a stable modular reconstruction. Directional branches are bridged into the celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries. Custom-manufactured devices fit specific patient anatomy but demand stable physiology during the manufacturing interval; off-the-shelf multibranched devices support urgent repairs but demand strict anatomical suitability .

Physician-modified endografts

A PMEG is a manufactured graft modified by the treating team to incorporate patient-specific branch openings or branches; it is distinct from a manufacturer-customized device. It may address anatomy or urgency not met by an available commercial configuration, but requires a reproducible planning and modification process, specialist expertise and appropriate local governance. In a 2024 international single-arm study of 1,274 patients from 19 centres, 45.7% had complex abdominal and 54.3% thoracoabdominal aneurysms; 13.4% received combined fenestrated/branched PMEG repair. Overall technical success was 94% and overall 30-day mortality was 5.8%; mortality varied with presentation: 4.1% elective, 7.6% symptomatic and 12.7% ruptured. Median follow-up was 21 months. These results are not randomized comparisons with manufactured devices or open repair .

Postoperative imaging must assess sac size, endoleak, target-vessel patency and bridging-component integrity. Sac shrinkage is reassuring but does not prove freedom from every device problem; a stable sac alone is not equivalent to failure. ESVS 2024 recommends CTA within 30 days and at one year, with subsequent imaging individualized .

Spinal cord and organ protection

Spinal cord ischemia risk depends on the extent of aortic coverage, prior aortic repair, loss of segmental inflow, compromised internal iliac or left subclavian perfusion and perioperative hypotension. A single covered-length cutoff, including 20 cm, does not by itself determine whether a drain should be inserted .

Use a coordinated protection protocol: preserve collateral inflow, stage extensive coverage when feasible, maintain adequate perfusion and oxygen delivery, and perform early repeated neurological assessments. ESVS 2024 discusses maintaining mean arterial pressure above 80 mmHg in complex-AAA protection; targets require escalation when neurological deficits develop rather than being treated as an invariant ceiling .

Cerebrospinal fluid drainage reduces intrathecal pressure but carries risks including spinal or intracranial bleeding and catheter-related complications. ESVS 2024 recommendation 128 states that rescue drainage may be preferable to routine prophylactic drainage for complex AAA repair (IIb C), while selective prophylaxis may be considered in patients with particularly compromised collateral reserve or extensive coverage. ESVS 2026 similarly gives a conditional IIb C recommendation favoring a reactive strategy over routine prophylaxis for extensive ; its I A recommendation for prophylactic drainage concerns open thoracic/thoracoabdominal repair, not every FEVAR .

New weakness or sensory loss after repair requires immediate assessment, correction of hypotension and inadequate oxygen delivery, review of collateral perfusion, and urgent consideration of rescue drainage when appropriate. Drain insertion, pressure targets, volume limits and anticoagulation timing belong to a monitored specialist protocol; cerebrospinal-fluid pressure in mmHg must not be treated as numerically interchangeable with cmH2O .

Special considerations: sex differences and center volume

Complex endovascular outcomes are highly sensitive to institutional infrastructure. High-volume complex-aortic programs demonstrate superior target-vessel preservation, lower re-intervention rates, and reduced aneurysm-related mortality . Extensive thoracoabdominal coverage, failed prior EVAR, and hostile visceral incorporation prompt early referral to experienced aortic centers .

Women experience higher complication rates following complex fenestrated and branched repair. The disparity is driven by smaller iliac access vessels, constrained proximal neck anatomy, and less forgiving branch geometry . While female sex is not a contraindication to repair, preoperative counseling explicitly covers higher risks of access injury and altered visceral branch durability .

Areas of controversy

The optimal selection of bridging stents between balloon-expandable devices (prioritizing precise ostial placement and radial strength) and self-expanding components (accommodating tortuosity and motion) lacks universal evidence, leaving practice dependent on center-specific algorithms .

The indications for prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage versus selective or deficit-triggered placement remain unsettled due to the tension between profound ischemic rescue and the real risk of severe hemorrhagic complications .

Parallel-graft options

A chimney or snorkel runs alongside the aortic graft with its inflow above the proximal covered edge; a periscope uses retrograde inflow from below the covered segment. A sandwich configuration routes parallel branch grafts through an overlap between aortic components. These arrangements preserve branch perfusion without a purpose-built fenestration, but create potential gutters, compression and branch-occlusion failure modes. ESVS 2024 limits consideration of parallel-graft repair for complex AAA to emergency or bailout use, ideally with no more than two chimneys (IIa C). They are not equivalent default elective alternatives to fenestrated/branched repair .

PMEGs and manufacturer-customized devices also require separate appraisal. Manufacture time, available anatomy and expertise affect selection, while observational outcomes do not establish interchangeability or remove modification-specific governance requirements .

Further reading

  • Outcomes of advanced EVAR versus open surgery in the management of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2024). Advanced EVAR versus open repair in complex AAA.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of cerebrospinal fluid drain-related mortality and morbidity after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. (2024). Drain-associated harm in fenestrated/branched repair; not proof of routine drainage benefit.

References

  1. 1.
    Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2024

    Editor's Choice -- European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-Iliac Artery Aneurysms. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.11.002.

    PubMedDOI
  2. 2.
    The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. 2018.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2018

    The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. 2018. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.10.044.

    PubMedDOI
  3. 3.
    Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. 2002.
    PubMed-indexed article2002

    Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. 2002. doi:10.1067/mva.2002.123763.

    PubMedDOI
  4. 4.
    Fenestrations of a Standardised Physician Modified Endograft for the Treatment of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Demonstrate Similar on Bench Mechanical Performance Compared with a Manufactured Custom Made Device. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed article2025

    Fenestrations of a Standardised Physician Modified Endograft for the Treatment of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Demonstrate Similar on Bench Mechanical Performance Compared with a Manufactured Custom Made Device. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.09.057.

    PubMedDOI
  5. 5.
    Standardized approach for four-fenestrated physician-modified endograft to treat complex abdominal aortic aneurysms using Valiant Captivia. Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Standardized approach for four-fenestrated physician-modified endograft to treat complex abdominal aortic aneurysms using Valiant Captivia. Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101491.

    PubMedDOI
  6. 6.
    Skill Mastery and Learning Curve Analysis in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair with Physician-Modified Endograft. Annals of vascular diseases. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Skill Mastery and Learning Curve Analysis in Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair with Physician-Modified Endograft. Annals of vascular diseases. 2024. doi:10.3400/avd.oa.24-00037.

    PubMedDOI
  7. 7.
    Mixed-Reality-Assisted Physician-Modified Stent Grafts: An Experimental Preclinical Study. 2026.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    Mixed-Reality-Assisted Physician-Modified Stent Grafts: An Experimental Preclinical Study. 2026. doi:10.3390/jcm15041663.

    PubMedDOI
  8. 8.
    The Aortic Team Model and Collaborative Decision Pathways for the Management of Complex Aortic Disease: Clinical Practice Update From the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons/Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery/Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed articleClinical practice guideline2023

    The Aortic Team Model and Collaborative Decision Pathways for the Management of Complex Aortic Disease: Clinical Practice Update From the Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons/Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery/Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2023.07.031.

    PubMedDOI
  9. 9.
    European Multicentric Experience With Fenestrated-branched ENDOvascular Stent Grafting After Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: The EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry. Annals of surgery. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed article2023

    European Multicentric Experience With Fenestrated-branched ENDOvascular Stent Grafting After Previous FAILed Infrarenal Aortic Repair: The EU-FBENDO-FAIL Registry. Annals of surgery. 2023. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000005577.

    PubMedDOI
  10. 10.
    Midterm Outcomes and Aneurysm Sac Dynamics Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair after Previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Midterm Outcomes and Aneurysm Sac Dynamics Following Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair after Previous Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.01.070.

    PubMedDOI
  11. 11.
    Long-Term Propensity-Matched Comparison of Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Surgical Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Long-Term Propensity-Matched Comparison of Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Surgical Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2024. doi:10.1177/15266028231162256.

    PubMedDOI
  12. 12.
    Chimney Versus Fenestrated Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Juxta/Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Short-term Results. World journal of surgery. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2023

    Chimney Versus Fenestrated Endovascular Versus Open Repair for Juxta/Pararenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of the Short-term Results. World journal of surgery. 2023. doi:10.1007/s00268-022-06829-x.

    PubMedDOI
  13. 13.
    Long-term results of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in young and fit patients. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Long-term results of fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in young and fit patients. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.090.

    PubMedDOI
  14. 14.
    Urgent endovascular repair of juxtarenal/pararenal aneurysm by off-the-shelf multibranched endograft. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Urgent endovascular repair of juxtarenal/pararenal aneurysm by off-the-shelf multibranched endograft. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.07.005.

    PubMedDOI
  15. 15.
    Outcomes of advanced EVAR versus open surgery in the management of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2024

    Outcomes of advanced EVAR versus open surgery in the management of complex abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals. 2024. doi:10.1177/02184923241262847.

    PubMedDOI
  16. 16.
    Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 2015.
    PubMed-indexed article2015

    Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.08.068.

    PubMedDOI
  17. 17.
    One Year Stable Sac Predicts Worse Overall Survival and Midterm Outcomes Compared with Sac Regression after Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Fenestrated and Branched Endografts. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2026.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    One Year Stable Sac Predicts Worse Overall Survival and Midterm Outcomes Compared with Sac Regression after Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Fenestrated and Branched Endografts. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.06.027.

    PubMedDOI
  18. 18.
    Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life After Fenestrated Endovascular Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2023.
    PubMed-indexed article2023

    Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life After Fenestrated Endovascular Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2023. doi:10.1177/15385744231154123.

    PubMedDOI
  19. 19.
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of cerebrospinal fluid drain-related mortality and morbidity after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2024

    Systematic review and meta-analysis of cerebrospinal fluid drain-related mortality and morbidity after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.04.038.

    PubMedDOI
  20. 20.
    Evaluation of Hemodynamic Properties After Chimney and Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Annals of vascular surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Evaluation of Hemodynamic Properties After Chimney and Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Annals of vascular surgery. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2023.12.084.

    PubMedDOI
  21. 21.
    Adoption and clinical outcomes of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in a regional, multistate community hospital system. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Adoption and clinical outcomes of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair in a regional, multistate community hospital system. Journal of vascular surgery. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.030.

    PubMedDOI
  22. 22.
    Long-term outcomes after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed article2022

    Long-term outcomes after fenestrated endovascular aortic repair for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.050.

    PubMedDOI
  23. 23.
    Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair After Failed Endovascular Aortic Repair. Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2025.
    PubMed-indexed article2025

    Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair After Failed Endovascular Aortic Repair. Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2025. doi:10.1177/15266028231174113.

    PubMedDOI
  24. 24.
    Editor's Choice - Sex Specific Outcomes After Complex Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2022.
    PubMed-indexed articleMeta-analysis / systematic review2022

    Editor's Choice - Sex Specific Outcomes After Complex Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.05.026.

    PubMedDOI
  25. 25.
    Multicenter Study on Physician-Modified Endografts for Thoracoabdominal and Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Circulation. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Multicenter Study on Physician-Modified Endografts for Thoracoabdominal and Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Circulation. 2024. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.123.068587.

    PubMedDOI
  26. 26.
    Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Dissection Using Customized Single-Branched Fenestrated Stent-Graft. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2021.
    PubMed-indexed article2021

    Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Dissection Using Customized Single-Branched Fenestrated Stent-Graft. Vascular and endovascular surgery. 2021. doi:10.1177/15385744211010446.

    PubMedDOI
  27. 27.
    Mid-term outcomes of physician-modified endograft therapy for complex aortic aneurysms. Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Mid-term outcomes of physician-modified endograft therapy for complex aortic aneurysms. Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. 2024. doi:10.1093/icvts/ivae044.

    PubMedDOI
  28. 28.
    Early Financial Outcomes of Physician Modified Endograft Programs Are Dictated by Device Cost. The Journal of surgical research. 2024.
    PubMed-indexed article2024

    Early Financial Outcomes of Physician Modified Endograft Programs Are Dictated by Device Cost. The Journal of surgical research. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.003.

    PubMedDOI
  29. 29.
    Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. 2021.
    PubMed-indexed article2021

    Upchurch GR Jr, Escobar GA, Azizzadeh A, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(1S):55S-83S. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.076.

    PubMedDOI
  30. 30.
    European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Descending Thoracic and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Diseases 2026.
    PubMed-indexed article2026

    European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2026 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Descending Thoracic and Thoraco-Abdominal Aortic Diseases 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.12.050.

    PubMedDOISource

Educational use only

AI assists this editorial workflow. Published updates are human-reviewed before publication.

Not intended to diagnose, monitor, predict, prognose, treat, or alleviate disease.

Verify clinically relevant information against primary sources and current guidelines.

AI DisclosurePrivacyTermsCautions
Updates and feedback

You are reading the published chapter.

What has changed

Loading the change history…

Report a problem

Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Juxtarenal/Paravisceral Disease, and Fenestrated/Branched Repair · MedicalTextbook.ai